Biblical Account of Creation
Pieper writes, "Genesis 1 and 2 are not essentially different stories of the creation, but Genesis 2 is plainly seen to be a fuller report of the creation and of the first dwelling place of man." Hebrew or a Hebraic mind set does not view things in a continuous line. I was taught that most of the time Hebrew or Hebraic mind puts emphasis on the Beginning but more importantly the middle phrase.
One looks at the middle of Genesis 1-2, you get 1:27-30. The creation of mankind as the pinicle of creation.
The other thing the Hebraic mind set likes to do is tell a story cyclical. Thus you find creation once than again (and possibly again). You find other places in scripture were the same story is told again. Sometimes it is repeated so that the Hearer (or Reader) can catch up on details. Just like when you re-read a book you can bring out new insights. The Hebraic mind set does this even in story telling.
Genesis 1 should not be viewed as a different event. But they should be viewed as the same event from a different point of view. Creation from the point of view of the son or the Holy Spirit. Thus, Pieper is correct in stating that these differences can help us just like reading the Gospel of John in comparison to the Gospel of Mark. They are not the entire story on their own but together Reveal the Holy Trinity. Thank you.
One looks at the middle of Genesis 1-2, you get 1:27-30. The creation of mankind as the pinicle of creation.
The other thing the Hebraic mind set likes to do is tell a story cyclical. Thus you find creation once than again (and possibly again). You find other places in scripture were the same story is told again. Sometimes it is repeated so that the Hearer (or Reader) can catch up on details. Just like when you re-read a book you can bring out new insights. The Hebraic mind set does this even in story telling.
Genesis 1 should not be viewed as a different event. But they should be viewed as the same event from a different point of view. Creation from the point of view of the son or the Holy Spirit. Thus, Pieper is correct in stating that these differences can help us just like reading the Gospel of John in comparison to the Gospel of Mark. They are not the entire story on their own but together Reveal the Holy Trinity. Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment