The Order Observed in Creation

Sometimes you have to remember you read stuff from a different time. Pieper writes, "The truly scientific study of nature, which is based on experience and observation, knows of no development of organic creatures from the inorganic and no evolution of a higher species from a lower."

Pieper's understanding of science was different from ours today. There may still be people who take science seriously today. But since most studies today do not actually advance true science. Science is knowledge this is why there is Sciences that cover Religious thought and the Abnormal.

Pieper tells us that real science or knowledge of truth does not show the organic can come from the inorganic. The truth is simple organic hings come from other organic things. Inorganic things come from compression and changes in inorganic things.

Rocks can change. Buildings can change. Living things grow and produce other living things. But there is no proof or context in which a particle becomes an animal. Pieper might be old but all he stated is still true.

I can prove things exist. I also have hard evidence that lower forms of life do not produce Higher forms of life. I have visible proof of design within creation. But no one has proof that the inorganic can produce organic things. Ask a scientist some time and He will sound pretty crazy. Thank you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Set Theory on the Trinity

Gettysburg of Abortion (South Dakota)

Biblical Marriage