Article that Started It
The article that got all this started was written by Arland J Hultgren entitled, "Hermeneutical Tendencies in the Three-Year Lectionary." Arland Hultgren from Luther Theological Seminary wrote an Article that explains some tendencies or observations. The First observation is related to the "synoptic fundamentalism." He writes, "Most of us would probably not have it otherwise with the lectionary. But we should remind ourselves that the primary use of the synoptic Gospels which the Lectionary provides does not necessarily, from a Lutheran perspective, offer more opportunities for the gospel to be heard. Martin Luther, it will be remembered, discerned that the gospel was proclaimed preeminently in the Gospel of John and said that the Fourth Gospel is, 'the one, fine, true and chief gospel.'"
Luther does look to the Gospel of John as the one who reveals the wondrous connection between Old and New Testament. This reflects on the throwing of John to the sidelines. There are others that will say that John takes precedence in Lent, Easter and Advent. The Lectionary does have the Gospel of John appear beyond Year B. The reduction of the Gospels that should be read to the Synoptics is a problem.
Even though the Lectionary is broken up into A, B, & C; People will still refer to these as the year of Matthew or Mark or Luke. But the Reformed still enjoy spending a lot of time talking about the parables of Christ. Preachers would rather preach on the teachings of Christ than a narrative. Think of the story of the Fig tree verses the parable of the Fig tree. If you know the differences give yourself a pat on the back from me. Most people think of both these accounts as a Parable. Most of the lectionary is the Major Events in the Synoptics or the parables of Christ. This is simply "Synoptic fundamentalism." Thank you.
Luther does look to the Gospel of John as the one who reveals the wondrous connection between Old and New Testament. This reflects on the throwing of John to the sidelines. There are others that will say that John takes precedence in Lent, Easter and Advent. The Lectionary does have the Gospel of John appear beyond Year B. The reduction of the Gospels that should be read to the Synoptics is a problem.
Even though the Lectionary is broken up into A, B, & C; People will still refer to these as the year of Matthew or Mark or Luke. But the Reformed still enjoy spending a lot of time talking about the parables of Christ. Preachers would rather preach on the teachings of Christ than a narrative. Think of the story of the Fig tree verses the parable of the Fig tree. If you know the differences give yourself a pat on the back from me. Most people think of both these accounts as a Parable. Most of the lectionary is the Major Events in the Synoptics or the parables of Christ. This is simply "Synoptic fundamentalism." Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment